Report Abuse
|||I replaced a transmission in only one of my volvos. It was beloved 1985 740 gle that had just reached 350,000. We ended up putting a turbo transmission from a 240 in there, which also meant we had to change the drive shaft out for something shorter as well. 350k on 1 transmission isn't bad.
Report Abuse
|||Chris is correct. Ford uses Volvo stuff, not the other way around.
Also, 740's and 940's (rear wheel drive) are nothing like the newer front wheel drive systems. The older rear wheel drive transmissions were more reliable because they did not have the electronics in them.
Report Abuse
|||That would be a dumb statement. In ANY car, manual transmission is more reliable than automatic. There are reasons why we still make manual transmissions today.|||If it checks out and the transmission fluid has also been changed every 30k miles than go for it. The trannys are good. Stay away from Volvo 2000 or newer, it's a Ford dressed in Swedish clothing.|||Well tell you what I'm a has been Volvo test Driver. You might say Autos are a bit more trouble then Manuals. But with the Manuals we had to replace the Clutch systems on a regular basis too.|||haha....I'llleave it at that.......|||The only problem with the trans on that model Volvo is the lack of a replaceable fluid filter. Knowing that , it becomes clear that regular maint must be preformed on it. That is why Volvo now recommends flushing the old fluid out regularly. If properly maintained the trans on that car should preform to the standards we have come to expect of Volvo power trains. I personally still like a stick, but in the five years I spent in Berkeley Ca. maintaining Volvo's , our shop never had a trans failure on a frt. wheel drive Volvo. David Walsh was adamant on regular service,not repair.|||I own 2 Volvo's a 93 940 turbo wagon with 215,000 miles on it. Transmission has not been replaced and works like new, and a 96 850 Turbo with 165,000 transmission is original and works fine.
No comments:
Post a Comment